BREAKING: Donald Trump is reportedly “raving mad” that Democrats will be broadcasting a live feed of his SOTU speech tonight from a thermal camera that shows if he poops himself, and is furious that this “Trump Dump Detector” could get more viewers than the regular broadcast.

BREAKING: Donald Trump Reportedly “Raving Mad” Over Democrats’ Planned Thermal Camera Broadcast of SOTU

Tensions are flaring ahead of tonight’s State of the Union address as Donald Trump is reportedly furious over what critics are calling one of the strangest political stunts in recent memory.

According to insiders, some Democrats are planning to livestream an alternative broadcast of Trump’s speech using a thermal imaging camera — a move sarcastically branded online as the “Trump Dump Detector.” The gimmick, as described by those promoting it, is meant to mock the former president and poke fun at the intense scrutiny that surrounds every one of his public appearances.

Sources close to Trump say he is “raving mad” about the stunt, viewing it not just as political opposition but as an attempt at public humiliation. What has reportedly added fuel to the fire is the suggestion circulating on social media that the thermal feed could draw more viewers than the traditional broadcast itself.

While it’s unclear how organized or official the plan truly is, the idea has already taken off online. Hashtags and memes referencing the so-called detector have been spreading rapidly, with supporters of the effort framing it as satire and critics calling it juvenile and beneath the seriousness of a State of the Union address.

Members of the Democratic Party have not universally endorsed the idea. Some Democratic lawmakers have reportedly distanced themselves from the stunt, concerned it could distract from substantive policy contrasts they hope to highlight during the speech. Others, however, see it as a sharp-edged commentary on what they describe as Trump’s flair for spectacle and media dominance.

Political strategists on both sides agree on one thing: the attention economy is brutal. In today’s media environment, viral moments often eclipse carefully prepared policy messaging. A thermal camera gimmick — even if intended as parody — could easily dominate headlines, trending topics, and late-night comedy monologues.

For Trump, who has built much of his political brand on commanding television ratings and dominating the narrative cycle, the suggestion that an opposing broadcast might outdraw the official speech is reportedly especially aggravating. Throughout his political career, he has frequently highlighted crowd sizes, television audiences, and social media engagement as measures of success.

Allies of the former president argue the stunt crosses a line. They say it trivializes an event that traditionally serves as a platform for outlining national priorities, economic plans, and foreign policy goals. Some Republicans have called the idea “desperate” and “embarrassing,” accusing Democrats of relying on mockery instead of debating substance.

On the other side, critics of Trump argue that political satire has long been part of American discourse. From editorial cartoons to late-night sketches, public figures have historically faced ridicule. Supporters of the thermal-camera stream frame it as exaggerated humor rather than a serious investigative effort.

Still, the controversy underscores the increasingly theatrical nature of modern politics. What was once a largely formal and scripted annual address has, in recent years, become a stage for viral moments — from dramatic applause lines to visible protests in the chamber.

Media analysts note that whether or not the thermal feed draws significant viewership, the mere existence of the story has already shifted focus. Instead of centering exclusively on the policies Trump is expected to outline, pre-speech chatter is buzzing about cameras, optics, and online pranks.

Some observers suggest that outrage — real or amplified — can sometimes serve both sides. For Trump, anger over the stunt could energize supporters who view him as unfairly targeted. For Democrats, provoking a reaction may reinforce their message that the former president is easily rattled by criticism.

As the speech approaches, networks are preparing for what could be one of the most watched political broadcasts of the year. Whether viewers tune in for policy, protest, parody, or pure curiosity remains to be seen.

One thing is certain: in an era where politics and entertainment often blur, even the rumor of a “Trump Dump Detector” is enough to dominate the conversation.

And if tonight proves anything, it may be this — in modern American politics, the battle for attention can be just as fierce as the battle over ideas.