WOW: Erika Kirk was confronted by the man speaking with Charlie Kirk when he got shot. He asked, as long as she’s condemning “violence from the left,” if she condemns Trump’s call to execute Democrats. She REFUSED. Hypocrite. Fascist. FRAUD. Click the link below for more details 👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾

In a CBS News town hall moderated by Bari Weiss on December 13-14, 2025 (aired over the weekend), Erika Kirk (widow of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, assassinated in September 2025) was confronted by Hunter Kozak. Kozak was the Utah Valley University student who had been debating Charlie Kirk moments before he was fatally shot.Kozak praised Erika’s calls for peace but asked if she would condemn President Trump’s “violent rhetoric,” specifically referencing Trump’s November 2025 Truth Social posts accusing six Democratic lawmakers of “seditious behavior, punishable by death” (after they released a video urging military members to disobey illegal orders). He called Trump “the most powerful and influential person on earth” with the greatest responsibility to de-escalate.

Erika Kirk responded by saying everyone shares responsibility for toning down rhetoric, including herself: “I think everyone has a responsibility to do that, and I’m doing my part.” She emphasized personal accountability (“we have to look in the mirror”) and rejected political violence outright, but did not single out or explicitly condemn Trump by name.

Sources across the spectrum describe this as her avoiding a direct condemnation:Left-leaning outlets (e.g., Raw Story, International Business Times) framed it as a “refusal” or “downright refuse.”

Right-leaning outlets (e.g., Daily Caller, Gateway Pundit) portrayed it as a principled stand for shared responsibility, rejecting a “gotcha” question.

Context on Trump’s StatementsTrump’s posts were widely condemned as dangerous by Democrats (e.g., Chuck Schumer called them calls for “execution”) and some Republicans urged milder language, though many defended them as highlighting alleged sedition. Trump later clarified he was “not threatening death” but defining the legal penalty for sedition.Is This Hypocrisy?Erika has consistently condemned violence from any side and called for unity post-assassination.
She did not equate or excuse any rhetoric but generalized blame, which critics see as evasive given her alignment with Trump.
Supporters argue it’s consistent: no one gets a pass, but singling out Trump would politicize the moment unfairly.

No major outlet used your exact proposed headline phrasing (“Hypocrite. Fascist. FRAUD”), as it adds unsubstantiated inflammatory labels beyond the reported refusal to directly condemn Trump.This incident highlights ongoing debates over rhetorical responsibility in polarized times, with both sides accusing the other of selective outrage.